home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.iadfw.net!usenet
- From: Brian Ebarb <ebarb@airmail.net>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.delphi,comp.lang.pascal,comp.lang.pascal.borland,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools.misc,comp.windows.ms.programmer
- Subject: Re: HELP: C++ or DELPHI ? We need translate DOS program which written in BP/TV.
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 08:15:50 -0600
- Organization: customer of Internet America
- Message-ID: <315E9396.704@airmail.net>
- References: <DoJ6yG.FIn@actcom.co.il> <315C20CD.7CEE@airmail.net> <828148622snz@tsys.demon.co.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dal02-02.ppp.iadfw.net
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01Gold (Win95; I)
-
- Tom Wheeley wrote:
- >
- > In article <315C20CD.7CEE@airmail.net> ebarb@airmail.net "Brian Ebarb" writes:
- >
- > > As for Borland C vs. Microsoft vs. Watcom vs. Symantec vs. (ad nauseum),
- > > my recommendation is simpler: Select a development environment that
- > > brings a future to both the project and the programmers who have to work
- > > on it. Real-world commercial apps are written in MFC. Borland doesn't
- > > support MFC, but OWL. OWL is cute, and quite popular among the
- >
- > I read (in an advert) that Borland C++ 5.0 supports MFC 3.2 / 4
- >
- > It also claims to compile Java and all sorts of other fun things.
- >
- > (Of course, _Real Programmers_ would never use MFC or OWL... ;-)
- >
- > .splitbung
- > --
- > * TQ 1.0 * The 'Just So Quotes'.
- > File names are infinite in length where infinity is set to 255 characters.
- > -- Peter Collinson, "The Unix File System"
-
- Ah... so Borland has licensed MFC from Microsoft! I think that sorta
- says it all!
-
- When Borland compilers write my code for me, pack my bags, and print
- my tickets to Tahiti, I'll consider changing.
- --
- - Brian Ebarb
-